Cheick's new Schmooveᴮᴸᴹ · @What_the_Cheick
6th Dec 2019 from TwitLonger
Just to clear some things up about this shit I was dragged into by oreo man
I wasn't gonna say anything publicly because I didn't want to add any more fuel to a situation that should've ended ages ago, but I feel when someone's gonna try and misrepresent me like this I have some sort of right to defend myself
So to clear some things
-I had no idea who Delvina was or that they even existed before today (Don't think Tom was lying, he just made an error)
-Tom didn't tweet en masse about e girls before his situation, maybe he talked about in other places but it really kicked up after that
(however it was a mean tweet that I made)
-Mark was approached by D Angelo, in which Mark gave his opinions on Tom, opinions which Mark says he doesn't think he's racist
(I've only watched D Angelo's video once so I don't remember it well, but) From my perspective, D Angelo's tweets were calling him racist, but in the video it seemed he changed his tone after talking to Mark
Nick is acting as if me Mark and D Angelo are a monolith. I said my intentions in my YouTube comments, and he misconstrued what I said and implies that I speak for all 3 of us, which isn't true, All my thoughts were in my comment, I even said myself "I don't think Tom is racist or anti-semitic or anything, at least not yet. I don't want to take Tom down, I talked about him in a video of mine, saying " I think people should be encouraged to try and change as a person rather than just get rid of them.""
Nick heavily implied that me and Mark were involved in some kind of plot to take Tom down, where Mark just gave his two cents, and I wanted to talk to D Angelo about the link between edgy humour and actual discrimination because I felt it was important after seeing it happen to someone else.
-This whole situation is pretty evident of the problems with this community and pretty much why I and others don't want to associate with the community. This minor drama was construed by Nick to make D Angelo come across as this evil mastermind trying to cancel Tom (cancel culture is just a nebulous term in general and in this situation with this specific situation it's being used to deflect any kind of criticism) and that Mark was some evil traitor feeding him information to make our hero Tom look like the villain. It's not that deep but framing it this way allows people to dismiss D Angelo's criticism.
I did nothing, and I wasn't going to do anything malicious.
https://twitter.com/zaptiee/status/1201287258042707973
This is where this should have ended, but Nick just wanted theatre, living of this drama and escalating it so he can talk about it some more, he pours gas on the fire and then reports on how large it gets. No matter how much he says he didn't explicitly say things, he heavily implied that me and Mark had a hand in trying to "cancel" him. His video is disingenuous at best and malicious at worst.