New York Times should speak to ALL violators of journalistic ethics


@ravisomaiya We would appreciate the New York Times to mete out equal inspection upon the NYPost as it did on Rollingstones articles. Please speak out with the same sort of admonishment for the baseless salacious lies regarding Michael Jackson in the NYPost -

It is the very SAME lack of journalistic ethics and self regulation that have been pointed out in the Rollingstones False UAV Rape case -

Howard Weitzman, attorney for Michael Jackson's Estate has stated publicly - against these reports.

"We are aware of recent false 'reports' regarding Michael Jackson having, among other things, paid over $200 million to 20 'victims . . . . There is not a shred of evidence to support these ludicrous 'reports.' It is unfortunate that, even in death, Michael cannot be free of these types of allegations, but we are confident that the truth will prevail in the end, just as it did in 2005 when a jury fully exonerated him."

Shouldn't the New York Times bring same sort of investigation regarding credibility of "sources" and the idea of copy paste journalism that AOL, USAToday, Fox etc employed when baseless salacious allegation against Michael Jackson, is posted again and again without benefit or research?

All we are asking is for FAIR & credible reporting -

MAbbas- MJJJusticeProject Inc.

Reply · Report Post