The reason it looks really bad for them is that those claims were aimed at those who didnt accept brand deals and are simply playing copies they bought on launch. It was already murky to say the least because they gave out pre-release code to those who were making videos that they sponsored, but didnt give out pre-release PC code to reviewers and critics (which again made no sense because the game is getting pretty much universal acclaim and rightfully so). Looking at the claim, it seems most likely that they registered cutscene content within the Content ID database and the claims are automatic. This is certainly far less malicious than directly going after channels that didnt engage in their brand deal and it seems like the most likely cause of this. The practice of registering cutscene content in the Content ID database has plagued reviewers in the past, flagging and taking down review and critique that is absolutely allowed under fair use doctrine. Hopefully @WB_Games will realise that they've made a mistake and release those claims, lest people assume a more malicious goal of censorship and undue control of the media narrative on their game. After all, they only have sales to gain from people showing off their game, since it's undoubtedly a very good product.