Read the criticism of my "definitions" video on Errant Signals forum. It was interesting, though I have to be honest I had to look up a few of the words being used. I think the primary take-away from it outside of the dismissive "gatekeeper" arguments is that some people have the opinion that games should be viewed as more than mere products and that to do so is a disservice. I think that's the difference between someone interested in academic/intellectual critique and someone merely interested in critique to inform their purchase decision. I am entirely fine with being on a "lower level" and merely critiquing to inform the consumer. I'm pretty happy with my lot in life and don't really seek to do anything more than make sure people buy good games and avoid bad ones and do so by being informed consumers. I'll leave the academic postulation to people who are better at it than I am. I got Errant Signal partnered with our network a long time ago because I think it's important to have those different perspectives.