RealMJFacts

MJ Facts · @RealMJFacts

25th Oct 2016 from TwitLonger

• "A molestation story that was supposed to have taken place in a double bed in the LA apartment where there was no bed at all"
Joy testified she slept on the floor in that apartment once so there must have been the same lack of furniture there.

> Joy and Chantal slept on the floor while MJ and Wade slept in the bed.

• Wade never says he was left alone at Neverland for a week. According to Joy Robson’s testimony in 2005, the Robson family (one set of grandparents, parents, and children) stayed for one weekend at Neverland, then the grandparents, father and daughter went to San Francisco for one week then returned to Neverland the following weekend. Wade and his mother stayed with MJ. When Wade says in his complaint “Plaintiffs family left the ranch on Monday to continue their road trip, but left Plaintiff behind to stay with DECEDENT,” he means he and his mother were left behind for a week.
You do know that there is only one plaintiff in this action, right? And you know the noun is in the singular? Is this a misunderstanding or are you really trying to twist the meaning of this ordinary word?

> True, and I'd like to see the explanation for that at trial. I don't imagine that soon after meeting MJ that Joy would have left her child alone with MJ while she went somewhere else for a week.

• Pedophiles can easily groom victims when other people are around, but in any case MJ had plenty of opportunities to spend time alone with Wade during that initial visit. Additionally, Chantal was in the same bed as MJ and Wade only once, and you would have to assume Chantal was asleep while MJ was molesting Wade as she says she never heard or saw anything untoward.
The type of dialogue in the story is one that would make anyone listen up. The problem is that the story is set during the very night that they were all there together. It is therefore impossible to have occurred.

> If Chantal was asleep, or nobody else was within earshot, MJ would have no problem having conversations like that. I'm not sure why you find that so unbelievable.

• It’s true that Wade has said he was completely unable to work in the entertainment industry in any capacity whatsoever. I don’t believe though that it is “as usual”, I believe that he means he can’t work in the higher echelons of the entertainment industry such as directing Hollywood movies, choreographing for big stars, doing worldwide tours etc. He has worked on a few minor jobs and that may be detrimental to his case -- I’d like to see how he explains those minor jobs at trial.
So again you twist the meaning of the words “in any capacity whatsoever”. There is no explanation other than this being a deliberate lie that will draw the trier of fact’s attention to Robson’s true motives.

> Twisting nothing - I repeat, I’d like to see how he explains those minor jobs at trial.

• Sorry, I have no idea what you are referring to here. What “first excuse”? What “shifting of the timeline”? What new excuse that I “choose to believe”? You need to be more explicit.
You don’t have a very good memory apparently. You told me you believe that his personal issues prevented Robson’s lawyers from doing their job. Shifting the timeline meant that lawyers changed the dates in their story on when Robson sought counsel to postpone the deadline. Now the story that you believe in only came up once the new timeline was revealed to be a lie. Of course had Robson had a true and honest explanation from the beginning there would have been no need to make up another one.

> "lawyers changed the dates in their story" - please tell me the specific pages and lines in the separate court documents where this was shown to happen so that I can see it for myself. I have no idea what you mean, I haven't noticed any discrepancies.

• Wade has never claimed that he had repressed memory, or that he didn’t know what abuse was. He admits that he deliberately chose to lie, but only because he was brainwashed by MJ.
It wasn’t Robson himself it was lawyers testing the waters for different explanations. Now recently Robson’s lawyers claimed it was his one deliberate choice to lie on the stand which is another departure from the tampering story.

> Wade Robson's lawyers have never said he had repressed memory. And yes, I agreed with you that Wade chose to deliberately lie in 2005, however the deliberate lying was a result of MJ's brainwashing. I don't know what you mean when you say "tampering story," you will need to elaborate.

• Wade believed, until therapy, he was never abused by MJ. Up until that time he believed what he and MJ had was a loving, consensual relationship which involved sex between them. He never saw the sex as abuse, and like many victims of acquaintance molesters he enjoyed and even sometimes initiated sex with his “friend”. The victims, like most people, would view abuse as something forced, or accompanied with violence. This is nothing new, you can read any study on these kinds of molesters which will give you the same answer as me.
Ok you’re parroting Robson’s story and whatever an accuser claims is your gospel but do you ever inquire further? The story sounds just like what one would experience in a marriage. Why was there never a moment in which Robson recognized the experience? Realistically the wedding night should have been the awakening moment and even that is a stretch.

> You make it sound as if it is uncommon for acquaintance molesters and their victims to behave like this. It isn't. http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC70.pdf
Wade Robson recognized the experience as a loving one because that was what he was groomed by MJ to think of it as. It's not unusual or strange in the world of MJ type pedophiles, even if you disbelieve it and don't find it credible.

Reply · Report Post