Battle(non)sense · @BattleNonSense
22nd Sep 2016 from TwitLonger
why I did not test cl_interp_ratio 1 at 128 ticks
As you have seen in the video, the LERP difference @64tick between cl_interp_ratio 2 and 1 is 15.6ms which only results in a delay decrease of about 7ms - and that is one single frame at a 144Hz display refresh rate
The LERP difference @128tick between cl_interp_ratio 2 and 1 is only 7.8ms (half of what it is at 64ticks) - which means that we are entering into an area here that is barely (if at all) measurable when using 144Hz monitors
So because of this I decided that it's not worth to spent an extra 2 to 3 hours on testing cl_interp_ratio 1 @128ticks as the outcome was quite obvious and I simply do not have an infinite amount of time to spent on these videos.
I actually already spent about 2 times longer on the production of this video than I originally planed (and the plan was to do input lag tests too). :-/