1st Available For War/More Hands Fewer Mouths/Community Energy Stasis/MUCH MORE


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2001/03/does_being_a_jock_make_a_man_gay.html
http://zeenews.india.com/news/health/health-news/baby-boy-boom-among-indian-immigrants-in-canada_1875191.html

It's known particularly baby productive females
who have particularly long strings of male
offspring, where those males are particularly
(more) masculine (there's a general naivete as
to assumptions there, traditionally,) the latter
born are a little more prone to being born
gay.
This appears being the basis of a study in
Britain showing a "ready to go" factor in
many females.

The Above Altogether Obviously Portray:
"FIRST AVAILABLE FOR WAR."

The ancient generals were typically gay.
There were ancient gay armies.

That psychiatry sees flamboyant and other behaviors
is consistent with the above now.
First, from hypermasculinity (hyper sexual expression.)
If this really serves a first available for war
function, then the behavior resonant with the
"Gem Hadar" from Star Trek makes all the sense in
the world. Any masochistic tendency serves the
purpose.

One really has to wonder if Rome's gladiators may
actually have often been gay.


CONSISTENT WITH THE ABOVE, IN TERMS OF
TRIBAL ADAPTATION TO SCARCITY OF RESOURCES,
IF TRIBAL TERRITORIALITY WOULD ORIGINALLY
HAVE RELATED TO THAT:

"MORE HANDS, FEWER MOUTHS"

It's important knowing presence of trait
does not mean gay.
These are only about correlations.

The Trump/Coulter dynamic's made clear
judging and capitalizing on biologic
naivete's poison to health and democracy,
each dependent on the other.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/07/000710071931.htm
(Left-Handedness)

http://www.biospace.com/News/more-left-handed-men-are-born-during-the-winter/339015/Source=TopBreaking?intcid=homepage-seekernewssection-tabfeaturedstories
(Left-Handed/Born in Winter, obviously consistent
with perennial scarcity positively associated with
the length and severity of Winters)


There's a commmonly observed paradox of those
insistent on judging gay persons negatively
themselves proving up being gay.

This is now explainable two ways:
Persons as presented above discovered they
could do that to advantage.

Also, this:
http://www.inquisitr.com/537949/ann-coulter-gays-can-get-married-if-they-marry-a-member-of-the-opposite-sex-video/
http://www.biospace.com/news_story.aspx?StoryID=324031

Many epigenetic or likely epigenetic phenotypes
(physical traits/behavioral hardwiring) are
(all) consistent with the above in direct relation,
somewhat direct relation, or otherwise in terms of
understanding all the above simply being a small
component of
"COMMUNITY ENERGY STASIS, INCLUDING COMMUNITY-
HABITAT EPIGENETIC ADAPTATION."

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Force+of+bite+may+predict+a+person%27s+longevity&t=opera&ia=web

http://www.livescience.com/1187-neanderthals-cannibals-study-confirms.html

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/warming-alters-mountain-plant’s-sex-ratios?tgt=nr

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160623100912.htm

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-05/jl-dfs050312.php
This is virtually the primitivistic version of biologic
relation to a culture's treatment of older persons.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150210132905.htm
(There're also finger length orientation correlations.)
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/695142.stm

The more cooperative the culture, the
greater the population it can sustain
--the immune system connection:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-07/uomm-urd071516.php

http://phys.org/news/2016-07-economist-humans-evolving.html
I suspect we're, at this point in the number of our
generations, "meant" to become endowed with a slightly
slightly lower fight or flight idle speed.

In that, besides independently having long been
abreadst essentially of all issues of public health and
medical care (I'm a public health professional,) it's
rightly acknowledged a UCSD pre-med thus far not
wanting pubicity by name who somehow connected myself
with a public health oriented website I write simply
said to me look at that, now look at that, and now think
fear response. He then himself acknowledged having
been influenced by Dr. Pincker (a Harvard professor.)

Add the entirety of dietary epigenetic adaptation
(native Americans having eaten cactus but now junk
food getting diabetes; the nisei and eisei, and an
utter endlessness of such adaptations and mal-
adaptations presently.)

It appears H.G. Wells got it right in "Time Machine."

But the above shows our cultural decisions define our
epigenetics and very species character, back and
forth, thus even throwing back a math in both economics
and biology to the cultural decision making.

Therefore, persons concerned about religious doctrine
should welcome the above. Morality and science share
a learning curve and inform each other.


Reply · Report Post