I'll go at this point by point.


Fred made a post "debunking" my previous twitlonger post that I showed to ReviewTechUSA, which can be found here - http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1soeuth


- Yes I did. :)



The screencap of Phil's message was given to them by a viewer. The first time that screencap was posted publicly was on their own livestream, which I showed in my other twitlonger. They doxed Phil, because it was not previously public, and because the screencap showed personal financial information pertaining to Phil's job on Youtube. Fans of the SoK later tried contacting machinima and telling them that Phil had breached his contract by disclosing how much he made. They posted it with pure malicious intent, as they do with everything regarding Phil.


- She ignores the fact that it wasn't actually financial dox. It was just Phil telling someone off the top of his head a ballpark estimate of how much his channel is worth. It doesn't even show how much he actually makes of that amount. So again, not even dox. She shows no proof that people tried to contact Machinima. Much like the DNCLeaks, which she supports, if people act on that information that is up to them if it did happen.




PUK015 is a person who the SoK despised because he did not worship them. They got into an argument over videos that neither group owned, then Fred posted PUK's picture on his alternate twitter account, which I also showed in my previous twitlonger.


- Interesting that she refers to 2 copyright strikes and a 3rd one that was about to be filed to take down our channel as an argument. Again, I explained how we have the picture, the fact that people already know what he looks like and that he posted it publicly on his facebook account that is so closely tied to his PUK015 twitter account with the same name it is public.


Fred has debunked none of this, just made up some quick bullshit to damage control. I posted actual proof, where is his?



- How is that made up? I said what happened. She wants me to post private convos as proof and then bitch about it after the fact and say I doxed.



Fred continues to claim that I conspired with another user to dox DSP_TXT and post his personal information.

http://imgur.com/a/7Bw64

As you can see, that is a total lie as well, something that seems to be a pattern when it comes to Fred.

He clings to the one part where I said, "Thanks, now I can go find where he lives". Something I said jokingly because I thought it was idiotic that this person cared about having someone's stupid skype id.


- This is the most ridiculous claim. You can see for yourself, she enjoyed looking at the info Boon was bringing her. Made a ton of jabs at txt during this process then said lets go find where he lives. At no point did she say anything against what he was doing. She was a willing participant and was happy to see txt get doxed because she disliked him for arguing with her.



I can equate this to Trump jokingly saying he hopes Russia can find Hillary Clinton's 33,000 deleted e-mails, and then the media freaking out saying he engaged in espionage and is a traitor to the country. Fred has about as much credibility as CNN, so this is an accurate comparison. Just like how CNN tries to brush off Hillary's criminal ties and instead just talk shit about Trump, Fred tries to brush off and ignore when he was wrong, and instead focus on creating fabrications about myself and others.



- Garbage analogy. We can read in black and white that Sam was actively engaged in doxing a person she didn't like. She can write it off as a joke because it's the easy way out. That is what Sam is all about, the easy way out.

- This is what she gets a kick out of, look at her Twitter account. It is designed to draw people in. She finds people to argue with because that is who she is. A toxic person with a god complex that they are doing the right thing and standing up for what's right.

Reply · Report Post