Nina Illingworth · @NinaDontPlayMtG
25th Apr 2016 from TwitLonger
The Democratic Nomination is being Fixed For Clinton
I'm tired, I can't be bothered to write all of this out so you're going to have to deal with a link dump - when paid Clinton trolls tell you how 'crazy' this is, this should shut them up for now.
A) Time Robbins tweet with key graphic: RE https://twitter.com/TimRobbins1/status/724618825824608258
B) Information about Exit Polls in General for when they lie to you about how inaccurate exit polls are: http://electiondefensealliance.org/frequently_asked_questions_about_exit_polls and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exit_poll - you can find many many more, but don't trust AMERICAN newspapers about it b/c they lie, actual academic authorities and voters rights groups will confirm to you that exit polling is highly accurate - so much so that we use it to track the fairness of elections in other countries. Note these two important bits from each article:
- "Around the world, exit polls have been used to verify the integrity of elections. The United States has funded exit polls in Eastern Europe to detect fraud. Discrepancies between exit polls and the official vote count have been used to successfully overturn election results in Ukraine, Serbia, and Georgia."
- "The difference between conducting a pre-election telephone poll and conducting an Election Day exit poll is like the difference between predicting snowfall in a region several days in advance of a snowstorm and estimating the region’s overall snowfall based on observed measures taken at representative sites. In the first case, you’re forced to predict future performance on present indicators, to rely on ambiguous historical data, and to make many assumptions about what may happen. In the latter, you simply need to choose your representative sites well. So long as your methodology is good and you read your measures correctly, your results will be highly accurate."
- "Exit polls have historically and throughout the world been used as a check against, and rough indicator of, the degree of election fraud."
C) some math explaining HOW goddamn unlikely this is to be an accident: https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4g3x5h/investigative_journalism_why_bernie_may_have/
D) A video from Chicago that shows erasing Sanders votes & adding Clinton votes: https://youtu.be/OSNTauWPkTc?t=23m3s this takes a while, but trust me, within 10 minutes you'll figure out WTF is going on. If you wait long enough a woman who IS an expert in Audits destroys the case.
Then, when they tell you "oh no, that's too big a conspiracy" take them through ALL the objective ways Clinton's campaign has already been caught cheating/fixing this primary:
E) Paid Trolls Evidence: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-hillary-clinton-paying-trolls-attack-people-online-article-1.2613980?cid=bitly
F) Media Lying/Message Crafting For Clinton: http://www.ninaillingworth.com/wall-of-shame/
G) Media actively participating in a coordinated smear campaign with Hillary Clinton: http://www.ninaillingworth.com/2016/04/08/the-war-between-us-how-the-clinton-media-machine-just-lost-the-democratic-primary/
H) Dirty Money DNC Collusion: http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/01/how-hillary-clinton-bought-the-loyalty-of-33-state-democratic-parties/
Look, there's at LEAST 10 more fucking examples but I feel like if you can't tell the fix is in just from this, you're either a fucking idiot or in on the game.
- Nina
PS - if you don't think it's easy to hack an electronic voting machine, watch this as well: https://youtu.be/M7W7rHxTsH0?t=1s - bring a teddy bear, this is a fucking nightmare.