Unpopular opinion about the recent ESEA match dispute

---

Yes the game should be replayed at 15-12, but most leagues also have following in the rules "Investigation request When a team estimates being a victim of rule violations during a match, players are compelled not to stop the game by any means and to properly finish it."

When i read this statement from Unkrn: https://unikrn.com/community/statement-team-unikrn-re-recent-match-controversy/ and i see;

"This was a devastating outcome for our girls, who had spent the week bootcamping around the clock in Berlin at the Caseking HQ. Noticeably shaken, they were unable to rebound, and the match ended 16-14 for Revival."

I start to wonder. How can professional players let themselves be so affected by a decision that you lose a match. Should you not focus on winning and then after the game dispute the verdict?.

I also understand that the teams are mentioning the wrongfull doing in the middle of the game as they should do. However, if an admin has decided not to change the score should teams continue to focus on the game instead and give it the focus in social media, etc. afterwards.

Reply · Report Post