@GloucesterCity @writetothem Hope your emails are fixed soon. In the meantime...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [email address]
To: [Sue Mullins], [email address], [email address]
CC: [email address]
Sent: 23/08/2014 13:32:50 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: In case legal services failed to spot this...

(and I will ask again, why did it take three weeks, as admitted by
the council, to forward the email from WTT to cllr Patel?)

Dear Mr Kilker

Public online message boards and potentially defamatory statements

It has been drawn to my attention that you are using public online
message boards to make potentially defamatory statements about
Councillor Patel. The message boards are in the public domain and
are found here: www.twitter.com/TrollhunterX and
www.trollhunterx.proboards.com.

Whilst recognising the importance of free speech and open public
debate on issues of public interest or concern, where defamatory
statements are made, defamation actions may be taken against you by
the individuals concerned.

I would request that you give careful consideration to any future
material that you place in the public doman for these reasons.

The usual formal channels continue to be available to you if you
have matters you wish to raise in the future.

------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Beyond it being 'drawn to your attention', do you have any evidence
to substantiate these claims? One would suffice.

Perhaps you could enlist the aid of Martin Surl and his new
cybercrime division (not a pretext to demand more money at all).

In fact, I have given careful consideration to everything I have
said about authorities in Gloucestershire, be they the council, the
police force, or quasi-authoritative crime commissioners, and
'community leaders'. As I have mostly been complaining about the
incompetence and corruption of those bodies and individuals (and
suspect that the corruption may have developed as a consequence of
covering up the instances of incompetence), any action you now feel
like taking would be very welcome. Publish and be damned.

But I do have a matter to raise with you, having received not just
your letter above this morning, but a supposed response to my
complaint about cllr Patel.

As I have made repeatedly clear, I have 'referred' requests for
information to the board of BTD, as requested by the board, on half
a dozen occasions over half a year, and received not one single
response (each time being told by staff that I would need to email
them, when I visited their offices to ask why I'd received no
answer). Therefore, despite cllr Patel insisting that it would be a
'conflict of interest' for him to 'be involved in matters relating
to BTD', I can see no other option, if the board continue to behave
like this, other than for my ward councillor on the board to act in
my interests, and the ward of Barton & Tredworth. Or perhaps he, a
Conservative councillor, would like one of our other, Labour, ward
councillors to take on the job?

But do I need to remind you, Ms Mullins, that following your
failure to provide any confirmation about the informal resolution I
supposedly agreed to for over three weeks, and the dismissal by
Martin Shields of my complaint about that, I opted for formal
resolution instead, as whichever I choose, you seem determined to
string things out, and a[s] formal resolutions probably have strict
time constraints. So no, I don't consider my complaint resolved, in
any way.

Read more:
http://trollhunterx.proboards.com/thread/516/city-council-trying-on?ixzz3BDY474v3=undefined

Yours sincerely,

Joe Kilker

Reply · Report Post