(Didn't know we could reply via TwitLonger! I have no idea where this will be readable.)
Your response here is //precisely and exactly// what my Exhibitum "discourse system" addresses.
For example: given that article, imagine how many replies / responses there might be, now imagine the number of arguments there might be, now imagine the number of propositions there are in it that draw attention and replies/responses/comments/arguments for and against.
So: from 1 article, a flurry of communicative gestures.
On top of that? the number of arguable propositions is //immensely smaller// than the number of items/entities presenting each one of those proposition.
So, like the cosmos, X * Y * Z.
My inspiration? Hesse's _glasperlenspiel_ (as system, technique, and methodology) in "Glass Bead Master" aka "Magister Ludi".
Do folk really care? not many, no., Does aggregation/curation have any traction in #AttentionEconomy? not really, no.
Does the community of principled practioners feel the need for better tools and better techniques and better methodologies? not often, no.
All I have is a fulcrum ... for the levers we're pulling and pushing.
Does that attract much attention.