Few of those claim that Assange being under House Arrest is not fair, Not only did he brake laws in Sweden, (Laws that only are in Sweden and the UK) but also broke conditions of he's bail, there for he costed alot of people money, He did brake laws, so saying that he shouln't face them is like saying he's an outlaw, Why can he brake laws and not face it? and can do anything he likes with out having to answer for it, stating that WikiLeaks is a journalistic organization is also completly wrong, because Wikileaks hasn't pusblihed a single Article about any of the files they've published also, how many editors-in-chief can you name that are running for senate? Also, WikiLeaks is an organization claiming they have no political ties, still they are running for senate, WikiLeaks is an organization that claimes that it fights for freedom of information, freedom of speech, transperancy, fighting for justice, well many WikiLeaks staff and Volunteers, have leaked information from WikiLeaks, spoken about there time at WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks has active criminal lawsuits against Ex-Volunteers and Staff, for leaking information from the organization, My self included in that, WikiLeaks Goes public at scrutinizes the ex-staff and volunteers that leave the organization , WikiLeaks fights for Justice but still the Editor In Chief of WikiLeaks is running from Justice for those women in Sweden, he's breaking laws by breaking he's Bail Condition,WikiLeaks claim they have no polticial ties to any government/or political party and im not saying they do, but it is strange that WikiLeaks host's an TV Show on Russia Today, which is operated by money from the Russian Federation, and still no files about Russia has been reveled, nor Ecuador or Venezuela,, WikiLeaks has published information, Some here say that documents revealed by WikiLeaks showed War Crimes, that it self is partly true, 95% of the data that WikiLeaks has published such as the Iraq and Afghan War logs, Diplomatic Cables don't show anything illegal or wrong doing, the rest 5% maby 1-2 % of that show something that's illegal, the rest might show some wrongdoing, perhaps not illegal, So Yeah what Bradley Manning did was illegal that can't be debated, did he get the treatment he deserved ? Hell no, Should he have been charged like he was? Yes, why? He revelaed hundreds of thousunds of classified information that did nothing but embarress the US, If he would have leaked only information that showed act of War Crimes, then i don't think he would be in the some positions as he is in today, but though getting a sentance from 136 years to 35 years roughly, i'd say that's a good deal, Now, some of you might come with the answer that that's just want they want us to think, some Main Stream Media stuff, well that's just bullshit, so in the light of all this, WikiLeaks isin't so diffrent from the US Government, they both claim the fight for freedom of info, speech, transperancy etc... but both also think it shouln't only work one way, and not towards them.

Reply · Report Post