Captain Obvious · @Captien_O
23rd Jul 2013 from TwitLonger
@MissAnonNews
Copy: @bullyville @__X13 @IxjxI @d0ct0r_dOom @silent_execute @A_Honeypot_ @prle57 @Hexicon @SDzzz @ @shadowrapz @Fawkxy @1_and_only_LC @laendra01 @CassandraRules @Misspell @Aim22High @Sanguinarious @MichelleLMcKee @BreaKBeatJunkee @AnonChimp @LanaLanaBobanna @IndianaAnny @Ammerella @ToddKincannon @LuluBot75 @seriousmode_5 @MyLawyerNinja @joefrancissucks @P2_D_U @Gotham_Rocker @RustleVille @rufus_lingo @Anonymous20140
Dear MissAnonNews aka OccupyRebellion:
I’m going to do my best to explain something to you the best I can as I am not convinced you have the capacity to understand since you apparently have the intellectual capacity of a peanut.
This http://imgur.com/rcPHphK is an act of libel. A provably false statement which you have made to some poor woman’s employer in an attempt to get her fired because like an idiot, YOU COPIED THEIR EMPLOYER ON THE TWEET. I’m going to try to explain what a complete cluster fuck you just got yourself into:
• First, it is unclear you even have the right person and the problem with that you fucktward, is that it so happens there is a real Amber Thomas that works at AT&T in their mobility financial group in AUSTIN TEXAS. The d0x you so clumsily relied on is regarding a completely DIFFERENT Amber Thomas who works at the Yellow Pages in GEORGIA. You know . . . THE YELLOW PAGES . . . aka YP Holdings which is the parent company for YP, LLC, an online advertising company and DIRECTORY PUBLISHER – that’s right- telephone directories. In other words, NOT AT&T. YP does not have access to unpublished phone #’s and associated information. Why you ask? Well that would be because they print DIRECTORIES of information that people want to be made PUBLIC and the phone companies like AT&T do not send them private subscriber information. Interestingly enough, I was able to figure all of this out in under 5 minutes on Google. Unbelievable that you call yourself Anonymous since you have to rely on others to d0x for you and you clearly lack the ability to perform the most basic verification of PUBLICLY available information.
• Second, let’s assume for a moment that the d0x you are relying on here http://pastebin.com/yPW6DYGc is even remotely accurate (big assumption there) – you still have a problem – you have ZERO proof the accusation you made is true.
To summarize, you just opened yourself up for a lawsuit. Zero proof of allegations generally does not work out well for people like you in a courtroom. And, if the d0x is inaccurate, let me spell this out for you - YOU JUST ACCUSED AN INNOCENT WOMAN OF A FEDERAL CRIME AND COPIED HER EMPLOYER.
And if that’s not enough, your buddy, and resident internet doofus Neal Rauhauser, decided to compound your stupidity by posting the following on his blog “If the information on Amber Thomas is correct she’s next in the hot seat – no more job, house foreclosure, probable prosecution if they can demonstrate she was passing information from AT&T to Anonymous.” Key word here being “if” the information on Amber Thomas is correct. Here’s a novel idea – why don’t you and Neal take those technical skills you both like to brag so much about and actually USE them to check your shit.
Either way, I want to make sure you understand what this kind of stupidity means if Amber Thomas decides to sue your stupid ass, and frankly I hope she does, it means if discovery. In a nutshell it means subpoenas to both your VPN and your ISP. Welcome to the big leagues honey you just got punked.
Oh yeah and BTW . . . . potato.