Researcher for MJJP · @JamLoveChange
2nd Aug 2012 from Twitlonger
THE JUDGE WILL CONSIDER A MOTION BY KATHERINE JACKSON'S ATTORNEYS ON WHETHER SHE CAN DISQUALIFY THE MEN FROM ADMINISTERING THE ESTATE ON GROUNDS OF THEIR CAPACITY OR POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS.
BECKLOFF SAID HE NEEDED MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE MOTION, INCLUDING A COPY OF THE PRIVATE TRUST THAT CONTAINS A "NO CONTEST" CLAUSE STATING THAT ANYONE WHO CHALLENGES JACKSON'S WILL SHOULD BE DISINHERITED.
THE JUDGE SAID HE THOUGHT THE LAW ALLOWED KATHERINE JACKSON TO CHALLENGE BRANCA AND MCCLAIN BASED ON NARROW ARGUMENTS AND SCHEDULED AN AUG. 28 HEARING ON THE ISSUE.
ONE OF THE QUICKEST ISSUES RESOLVED WAS ALSO ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT — BECKLOFF ADMITTED JACKSON'S FIVE-PAGE WILL DRAFTED IN 2002 FOR PROBATE, A PROCEDURE THAT GRANTS IT SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT.
"IT MEANS IT IS THE WILL THAT HAS BEEN LEGALLY RECOGNIZED AS THE WILL OF MICHAEL JACKSON FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE," SAID PROBATE ATTORNEY MICHAEL G. DAVE, WHO IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE CASE.
THE WILL WAS ENTERED WITHOUT FANFARE, OBJECTION OR ANY HINT OF DRAMA.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/04/6-29-09-Petition-Open-Probate.pdf
KJ and Joe petitioning for administrator on 6.29.09 when the courts opened, right before they were supposed to meet w/ JB at 11a the same day.. LOL
By Nov. 12, 2009, KJ had dropped her objections to JB/JM as execs:
>WHILE JACKSON'S MOTHER, KATHERINE JACKSON, DROPPED HER OBJECTIONS TO THE APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY JOHN BRANCA AND MUSIC EXECUTIVE JOHN MCCLAIN AS THE PERMANENT EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE, MICHAEL'S FATHER, JOE JACKSON, FILED A 60-PAGE PETITION WHEREIN HE ASKED FOR A $20,000 PER MONTH ALLOWANCE FROM HIS SON'S ESTATE AND VOICED HIS OBJECTIONS TO THE APPOINTMENT OF BRANCA AND MCCLAIN.<
HTTP://WILLS.ABOUT.COM/B/2009/11/12/THE-LATEST-ON-MICHAEL-JACKSONS-ESTATE-EXECUTORS-BRANCA-MCCLAIN-VS-JOE-JACKSON.HTM
http://WILLS.ABOUT.COM/B/2009/11/12/THE-LATEST-ON-MICHAEL-JACKSONS-ESTATE-EXECUTORS-BRANCA-MCCLAIN-V
WILLS.ABOUT.COM
Monday November 30, 2009
Recently it has been reported that Taj Jackson, the 36-year old son of Tito Jackson and nephew of Michael, has been given a say in the administration of his uncle's estate. Rumor has it that the real reason why Katherine Jackson so suddenly dropped her objections to the appointment of John Branca and John McClain as permanent co-executors of her son's estate is because Branca and McClain have agreed to allow Taj to be the voice of Michael Jackson's three children, Michael Joseph "Prince" Jackson, Jr., Paris Katherine Michael Jackson, and Prince Michael "Blanket" Jackson II, with regard to future projects and business deals involving Jackson's estate.
...
However, the informal promotion of Taj to co-executor has apparently infuriated Michael's father, Joe Jackson, who plans to continue his challenge of the validity of his son's 2002 Last Will and Testament and the appointment of Branca and McClain.
http://wills.about.com/b/2009/11/30/the-latest-on-michael-jacksons-estate-is-nephew-taj-jackson-in-charge.htm
Jan. 22, 2010, MJ's estate execs filed a motion to deny Joe his stipend since he was not an heir, and could not provide any proof that MJ financially supported him.
HTTP://WWW.NYTIMES.COM/2010/01/23/ARTS/MUSIC/23ARTS-003.HTML
Joe's petition for a monthly stipend got kicked around some more, until May 2010...
all the while, JB and JM got their compensation approved lol
*slap slap* in the face of Joe's big ego
March 2010, MJ's estate execs offered Joe a stipend, based on KJ and the kids' supposed support, but Joe turned it down.
(I guess this is when Joe decided that he had bigger ideas to pursue...like Mann and fake htwf)
Roger Friedman stated that Joe decided that he didn't want the $15k/mo stipend, that it was not enough for Joe
NOW ALMOST 6 MONTHS AFTER JOE JACKSON SOUGHT FOR AN ALLOWANCE FROM HIS SON’S ESTATE, HE HAS SUDDENLY DECIDED TO WITHDRAW HIS REQUEST FOR THE TIME BEING. AND NO, THIS IS NOT A CHANGE OF HEART IN THE OTHERWISE NOT SO GOOD FATHER; JOE JACKSON HAS JUST HAPPENED TO DISCOVER ANOTHER LUCRATIVE DEAL, WHICH HE IT APPEARS PREFERS TO CONCENTRATE ON AS OF NOW.
HE’S NOW GOING AFTER THE MAN HE HOLD’S RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS SON’S DEATH- DR. CONRAD MURRAY. JOE HAS NOW FILED A WRONGFUL DEATH LAWSUIT AGAINST MURRAY AND IS SEEKING $ 75,000 FOR THE SAME.
SAD BUT TRUE , JOE JACKSON IS THE SAME MAN WHO WAS PROMOTING HIS NEW RECORD LABEL 3 DAYS AFTER HIS SON’S DEATH AND NOW SUDDENLY HE SEEMS SO CONCERNED AS TO GET JUSTICE FOR HIS LATE SON, BUT OF COURSE ONLY BECAUSE OF THE MONEY INVOLVED.<
HTTP://WWW.NEWSXONLINE.COM/ENTERTAINMENT/MICHAEL-JACKSONS-FATHER-DOESNT-WANT-ANY-FINANCIAL-SUPPORT-FROM-HIS-LATE-SONS-ESTATE-WHATS-BROUGHT-ABOUT-THE-CHANGE-IN-HEART-IN-THE-OTHERWISE-NOT-SO-FATHERLY-FIGURE-201007021110