TO THE #CHC CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS: "NO! NADA!"

"I wrote about this in Machismo at Work : Members of the CHC who voted for the Stupak Amendment and against women's rights; so allow me to go meta:

If you are not looking closely, some of these votes do not make sense given the previous voting record of people like Costa ad Rodriguez. After all, wasn't Ciro Rodriguez a darling of the netroots? And yet when you look closely at their lists of donors, their votes actually become not just sinister but cynical as well (as in the case of John Salazar). So we can't just blame it on the fact that all of these guys happen to be Roman Catholics or members of the Blue Dog Coalition. It's those donors lists for 2008 and 2010 that really paint a clearer picture of their "conservatism".

Last but not least, compared to the Congressional Black Caucus, the CHC delegation voted atrociously : Artur Davis was the lone member of the CBC who voted for Stupak. Why couldn't the CHC conjure such discipline when voting a measure that would basically kill women's right to an abortion? Or are their votes exactly correlated to the 2007 "whore" scandal that rocked the CHC thanks to John Baca's leadership in disrespecting the women of the caucus?

In that post I was trying to figure out why did a vast majority of Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Los Siete Infames, voted with Stupak. Am too much of a cynic to believe they were voting with their pure Catholic hearts. What I found out at the time was that all seven had been heavily funded by the insurance industry.

http://culturekitchen.com/liza/blog/are_los_siete_infames_of_the_chc_the_key_to_passing_health_care_reform

#DEM #HCR #TLOT #TOPPROG #DLCSUCKS #FEM2

Reply · Report Post