gatorgirl277

GiGi · @gatorgirl277

16th May 2011 from Twitlonger

Here is a screen capture of the contract between Murray, AEG and MJ:

http://s61.photobucket.com/albums/h49/gatorgirl277/Public Folder/?action=view&current=murraycontract.jpg


IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement at Los Angeles, California and have made it effective as of the day and year first above written.


Dr. Conrad Murray (Name: Dr. Conrad Murray, Title: An Individual, Dated: June 24, 2009)

AEG Live Productions LLC (Name: ------------, Title: An Authorized Representative, Dated: June 24, 2009)

GCA Holdings, LLC (Name: Dr. Conrad Murray, Title: An Individual, Dated: June 24, 2009)


The Undersigned hereby confirms that he has requested Producer to engage Dr. Murray on the terms set forth herein on behalf of and at the expense of the undersigned:

By: ______ (Michael Jackson), An Individual, Dated June 24, 2009

Page 6

------------------------------------------------------

Notice the date "June 24"--wow and a few hours later Murray got an email from the insurance company and then bam, MJ was dead. Coincidence?

If Murray was supposedly treating MJ nightly since early May (and ordering propofol as early as April 6th) then why wasn't something like this signed WELL beforehand? How many people or companies do you know of that engage in services without signing some sort of agreement beforehand? Not many...

So MJ was suppose to be responsible for paying Murray (as he was with everything else) and supposedly requested AEG to "engage" Murray. Why, if he was to be paying Murray himself? If anything, this would wipe AEG's hands clean of having to pay Murray for past services but without a signed contract that makes this contract null and void. Is there a signed copy or no? I have yet to see one. Is there ANY signed proof that MJ consented to Murray's services? Where are copies of those emails between Murray and Tim Leiweke?

We already know a lot of these business talks seem to have been under the guise of "oral contracts" which do not hold up in court nor do they offer proof of anything. If there was no contract with Murray and AEG then why where they hell-bent on keeping Murray, emailing him (obviously he was a "somebody" to be being contacted by Lloyd's of London, too) but ditching Klein who should have been out of the picture in a few days anyway as he was not going to London?

This is just more evidence that AEG wanted to cover their ass from everything possible while ripping their meal-ticket off left and right, robbing him blind...

Reply · Report Post