Quick response to the NOTW "Cocaine in Underwear" story:

Here is Tom Mesereau's response to this toxicology report:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/54341600/Sherriff-s-Department-Report-2003

It states, beginning on page 12:

"Underwear and Cocaine--Mr. Jackson's underwear was found in a laundry bag, along with the bed sheets. This underwear had bloodstain and cocaine. A forensic lab for the Prosecution tested this underwear. NO cocaine, however, was found in the blood.

Mr. Jackson has vitiligo (sp). A medical injection he receives causes him to dispense blood. The underwear with the bloodstain reflects this fact.

It is unknown how and why the cocaine was found on the underwear. It may be evidence of contamination. In the alternative, someone may have brought cocaine during a fundraising party at Neverland in September 2003, where hundreds of people, including well-known celebrities, were present.

In short, neither the underwear nor the cocaine found on the underwear (and not in Mr. Jackson's blood) has probative value to any of the charged crimes in this case."

This should also be the case against Conrad Murray, where this information has NO probative value to any sort of innocence on Murray's behalf--NONE.

I am working on a lengthy blog regarding this entire tabloid-trash article--it will hopefully be up by tonight or tomorrow, I hope.

Reply · Report Post