razoronline

Aaron Ochs · @razoronline

11th Jan 2011 from Twitlonger

What I wrote little different than taking someone's e-mail address and somehow "tracking" it to someone's home address and employer. What this person did was use what's called a proxy, which allows people to bypass IP address bans.

Richard LeGros and Lynette Tornatzky are banned from Razor Online for spamming, insults and revealing personal information in <a href="http://www.rockofthecoast.com/razor/rules/">violation of the terms</a> after being warned. Neither of their personal IP addresses were publicly disclosed; only the proxy of the user "Ddt."

In other words, they're not allowed on my site and they continue to access it after they were prohibited from accessing it.

I believe that falls under California Penal Code § 602 ("criminal trespassing"), does it not? You're an uninvited guest who continues to have access to my site, correct?

Mrs. Tornatzky, posted as "Lynette," posted my home address on my own site in March 2008 along with a user by the name of "sam spade," who is also banned in violation of the expressed terms. They subsequently posted my information on SanLuisObispo.com under the names Lie_Detector and Judith, respectively, while referring to the "Wrecklamator." Those comments were swiftly removed by Tribune staff.

It doesn't feel good to have personal information posted on the Internet for everyone to see, does it?

It also doesn't help your case when <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/maria4csd.com">you consent to your contact information being publicly available online by the domain registrar</a>. Domain privacy settings are there for a reason.

Mrs. Tornatzky continues to make assertions without context. <a href="http://www.rockofthecoast.com/razor/2010/10/16/mixed-reaction-to-ring-the-doorbell/">Here is the context</a>. See for yourself.

Reply · Report Post