uruknet · @uruknet

23rd Dec 2010 from Twitlonger

IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ & RT! The lies of the smear campaing against #wikileaks & Assange exposed.

Yesterday WikiLeaks defector Daniel Domscheit-Berg denied the grotesque rumors about a deal between Assange and Israel http://bit.ly/hbeErj

This is a very importan news, since it exposes the "alternative news" campaigners against Wikileaks as disinformers and liars, followed by a buch of brainwashed utile idiots.

The allegation that Assange 'struck a deal with Israel' over the diplomatic cables leaks appeared on an Anonymous' indybay article http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/12/07/18665978.php . That slandering garbage became the SEMINAL article of the "Wikileaks is a Mossad/Israeli front" cult. It was published on Indibay on Dec 9, 2010 and was immediately reposted by the disinformation website Veteran Today (that heads the anti-wikileaks cult and whose cointelpro wonderful team probably wrote it). Veteran Today's editor, the professional disinformer Gordon Duff - who started defaming wikileaks and accusing it of being a Mossad operation even before the release of the cables - claimed that the Indybay article was the definitive proof that Wikikleaks is linked with Israel: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/08/gordon-duff-busted-wikileaks-working-for-israel/

Not only the indybay article twists any facts and openly lies to defame Assange and Wikileaks (for a rebuttal of that bullshit http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/12/09/18666091.php ) , but it quotes as ONLY source of the alleged Assange-Israel deal a trash syrian website written in Arabic , Al-Haqiqa/syriatruth http://www.syriatruth.info/content/view/977/36/) . Al-Haqiqa claimed that Domscheit-Berg emailed them that Assange got money from Israel to destroy any documents that could damage Israel’s interests, originated mainly from the US embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut ( by the way Indybay mistranslated "originated mainly from the ISRAELI embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut". and the thousands of morons that spread that crap all over the internet didn't even notice that this is just impossible since Israel cannot have embassies Tel Aviv and Beirut). Of course Al-Haqiqa didn't publish the alleged (and actually inexistent ) emails. Moreover the author of the article , Lia Abramovitch seems to not only have not interviewed Domscheit Berg, but seems to not exist

But there is a "strange" fact: the Anonymous at Indibay (maybe the same Gordon Duff) and Gordon Duff didn't mention at all Domscheit-Berg's name: they only wrote that "the sources of the Al-Haqiqa report are said to be former WikiLeaks volunteers who have left the organisation in the last few months", whilst Al-Haqiqa openly and profusely quoted the alleged Domscheit-Berg's emails. Why did the Anonymous and Gordon Duff hide Domscheit-Berg's name ? The reason is not too difficult to understand: the disinformation COINTELPRO team at Vetaran Today well knew that the allegation of Assange having dealt with Israel was was totally false and they thought that it was unlikely that Domscheit-Berg could read a Syrian crap site in Arabic, whilst he would have noticed his name in an english article and therefore he would have immediately denied those false and grotesque rumors.

The Indybay's and Gordon Duff slandering articles were reposted by THOUSANDS of "alternative" utile idiots and used by other slanderers of Wikileaks (f.e. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22467 ). Therefore finally some mainstream media wrote about that rumor and checked the syrian website Al-Haqiqa. So they discovered that the alleged source of Al-Haqiqa would have been Domscheit-Berg, who finally has been informed of Al-Haqiqa's claims. Of course Domscheit Berg immediately denied that lurid slandering story and worte that the crap syrian website even refused to post his denial. Of course Veteran Today and the other alternative websites devoted to slander and defame wikileaks didn't publish Domscheit Berg's denial.

By the way, it's false that Israel isn't damaged by the leaks : Justin Raimondo, Richard Silverstein, Alex Kane and others profusely wrote about the clables damaging Israel (f.e this very important article: http://www.uruknet.info/?p=72472 ). But the western press didn't publish them and most of the "alternative news" & "anti-zionist "(??????? LOL ) webistes too hid them, since those cables would have clashed with their grotesque allegations that Assange and wikileaks are linked with Israel/ Mossad.

This is how disinformation works.


Breaking: Globarsearch - that is trashing wikileaks but doesn't want to expose itslef too directly - today has removed Gordon Duff's article: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22202 But of course Globalresearch gatekeepers didn't publish Daniel Domscheit-Berg's denial.

Reply · Report Post