For anyone interested in legal situation re Woolas> So.. it seems pretty clear that Woolas is no longer an MP as of the moment the judgment was published. He has no right of appeal because of S144(1) Representation of People Act 1983: it is crystal clear the election court's decision is FINAL. He's also now barred from re-standing as an MP under s160(5) for a full 3 years having committed an "illegal act".
His only hope now is a Judicial Review, but under English law he can't challenge the 1983 Act of Parliament, as it's primary legislation, so can forget that. Only real hope is to say there has been procedural impropriety or some other similar valid ground for JR: that's pretty difficult to allege against 2 High Court Judges following rules laid out by statute.
He's first going to have to get the High Court in London to accept his petition for JR (which they probably will) - but he's not an MP in the meantime, and he's got an almost impossible fight on his hands when he does get to court. All he can possibly hope to prove is that the procedural rules were not fair; the Judicial factual findings against him are pretty damning, aren't subject to challenge, and they will in any case stick politically. If he overturns the rules, then presumably amended ones will be created, and he'll be back in the box at some future point facing the same allegations.
--> My unskilled assessment? (Given this isn't my area of law by a long way) - both legally and politically -
He's screwed.
http://tl.gd/6qq2lu
· Reply
Report post (?)
